Supreme Federal Court President Edson Fachin has formally closed Brazil’s Fake News Inquiry, the 2019 investigation into threats, disinformation campaigns and attacks targeting the court and its members. The move ends the main case after seven years, but does not automatically halt its offshoots, invalidate prior rulings or erase evidence gathered during the investigation.

Fachin’s approach seeks to draw a line between the inquiry’s original institutional purpose and its open-ended continuation. He said closing it did not erase its history or question the reasons for its creation, calling it important to protecting the court and constitutional order at a singular moment in Brazil’s republican life. But he also stressed that investigations “must find an end” and that defending democratic institutions must occur within constitutional guarantees.¹

The practical consequence is a case-by-case review of 104 linked proceedings. Criminal cases in which charges have already been accepted can continue independently, while other investigations and precautionary measures must show their own current, specific legal basis. Fachin also ordered sensitive personal, banking, tax and business data separated before the broader case file is made public.²

Coverage from the right has emphasized the inquiry’s procedural reach and its concentration in Justice Alexandre de Moraes’ office. One account noted that Fachin found 79 separate documents that had not followed the court’s usual processing flow, and quoted him as saying there was no sufficient basis to preserve the original inquiry indefinitely as the hub for successive investigative lines.³ That reading contrasts with the prosecutor-general’s assessment that the inquiry’s duration reflected continuing threats to justices, their families and the court’s ability to operate freely.¹

Criticism from commentators remains sharper still. Rodrigo Constantino called the closure “too little, too late” in a post on X.Rodrigo Constantino (Rconstantino)⁴ Paulo Figueiredo, meanwhile, argued that declaring the inquiry over was itself “fake news,” reflecting skepticism that its practical effects have truly ended.Paulo Figueiredo (8) (pfigueiredo08)⁵

The ruling therefore closes the central file while leaving the legal and political debate over its legacy alive in the separate cases that remain.