Story
Nov 9, 2026
Brazil’s post-election unity remains elusive despite broad hopes for Lula
The Quaest findings portray a country that wants the next Lula administration to work but remains sharply conscious of political division. One account stresses signs of improving confidence, while the other highlights the concerns and contested views that still shadow the election result.
Brazil emerged from its 2026 election with a strikingly shared diagnosis: division has endured, even as most people say they want President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva’s fourth-term government to succeed.
The survey, titled Brazil After the Ballot Boxes, found that 81% of respondents believed the country had become more divided after Lula’s re-election, while 15% said it was more united. At the same time, 94% said they were rooting for Lula to have a good government. CartaCapital framed those results alongside a modest improvement in public mood: the share worried about Brazil’s future fell from 54% in late 2022 to 48%, while optimism rose from 41% to 44%.1
Its account places the more hopeful responses in themes associated with Lula’s agenda. Democracy and opposition to bolsonarismo were the most frequently cited reason for optimism, at 20%, followed by social programmes and reducing inequality at 17%, and regulation of betting and social-media platforms at 16%.1
The right-leaning account reports the same broad picture but puts greater weight on the reservations beneath it. It notes that concern and optimism—48% and 44%, respectively—are effectively tied within the poll’s margin of error. Among respondents worried about the future, the leading concerns were the economy, public spending, debt and interest rates, cited by 27%; public security, corruption and governability also featured prominently.2
It also situates the divisions in attitudes toward the election itself. While 61% said the vote was clean and fair, 30% believed it had been fraudulent. Views of Senator Flávio Bolsonaro’s decision to leave Brazil were similarly divided: 62% considered it wrong, while 29% considered it right; 54% said he left to evade justice and 35% saw political persecution as the reason.2
Both accounts therefore point to the same tension: goodwill toward a successful administration has not translated into a broadly shared sense that the country is politically reconciled.