Daniel Vorcaro's defense criticizes PGR's opinion and again requests release
Lawyers classify the maintenance of the arrest as illegal and state that the reasons have lost validity during the investigations
TL;DR
- Daniel Vorcaro's defense team contests the PGR's recommendation to maintain his pre-trial detention.
- The defense labels the continued detention as illegal, arbitrary, and political, arguing the initial grounds have lost validity.
- The PGR supports Vorcaro's custody, citing risks to public order, the investigation, and law enforcement, along with the case's complexity.
- Vorcaro has been detained since March 4 and has been indicted along with 14 others in an investigation into transactions involving Banco Master.
- The defense refutes the indictment and argues that public opinion should not influence judicial decisions on pre-trial detention.
- Vorcaro's legal team intends to pursue appeals nationally and internationally to overturn the detention order.
- The PGR argues that the reasons for detention remain valid due to evidence of an operational core, attempted obstruction of investigations, and the severity of the alleged offenses.