Dino and Fachin clash at the STF over interrupting colleagues during a trial
The exchange of ironies occurred during the analysis of a report on the link between Moraes and Vorcaro.
TL;DR
- Justices Edson Fachin and Flávio Dino diverged on the procedure for interjecting during a Supreme Court trial.
- The disagreement occurred during a trial analyzing the relationship between Justice Alexandre de Moraes and ex-banker Daniel Vorcaro.
- Fachin stated that interjections should be directed to the Court President, citing internal regulations.
- Dino countered that interjections are directed at the minister speaking, a view echoed by Justice Gilmar Mendes.
- The discussion included witty exchanges and a debate on parliamentary procedure and the use of irony.