Entities warn about voting to end the 6x1 shift before the second round

TL;DR

Business entities are concerned about the potential vote on a constitutional amendment to end the 6x1 work shift, especially during the second round of presidential elections.
They believe a change of this magnitude requires more time and should not be rushed due to the electoral calendar.
The proposed amendment would reduce the maximum weekly work hours from 44 to 40, guarantee two days of paid rest, and maintain current salaries.
Industry groups estimate significant increases in production costs (up to R$ 267.2 billion) and a potential GDP drop (0.7%, or R$ 76.9 billion) if the hours are reduced.
Consumer prices could rise by an average of 6.2%, with specific increases projected for supermarket products, industrialized goods, and clothing.
Other sectors, like commerce and transportation, also anticipate substantial increases in inflation and labor costs.
The agricultural sector faces difficulties in hiring and a credit crisis, with concerns that the amendment could exacerbate these issues.
Entities also calculate an additional 9.1% cost for the second day of weekly paid rest, even for entities already on a 40-hour week.
They argue for more flexible transition rules and consideration of each activity's specific characteristics.
The timing of the vote is considered inopportune, as public debate is focused on the presidential race.
A broader social dialogue and evaluation of productivity, employment, inflation, and competitiveness impacts are requested.

Continue reading the original article